![]() ![]() This article traces the development of voiced prepalatal obstruents /dʒ/ and /ʒ/ in Judeo-Spanish, the language spoken by the Sephardic Jews since before their expulsion from late-15th century Spain. This paper claims that sound symbolic reduplicatives in Qarakhanid Turkic (as well as those in Turkish, Uzbek, etc.) prefer the vowel alternation pattern of ‘low vowel-high vowel’ and that this preference confines the vowel alternations in such reduplicatives in Qarakhanid to those that are represented with fatḥa-ḍamma, fatḥa-kasra, and alif-wāw. ![]() ![]() Bu makalede, iki heceli yansımalı ikilemelerde yer alan ünlü nöbetleşmesinde dile has kısıtlamaların mevcut olduğu iddiasında bulunarak, Karahanlıcanın, çağdaş Türkî dilin güneydoğu grubundaki diller gibi, ‘açık-kapalı ünlü nöbetleşmesi’ kısıtlamasına tabi tutulduğunu, ve Divan’daki iki heceli yansımalı ikilemelerde yer alan ünlü kombinasyonların bu nedenle fatḥa-ḍamma //. asır Türkî dili olan Karahanlıcada da mevcut olduğunu Divanü Lugat-it-Türk’te kaydedilmiş yansımalı kelimelerden anlıyoruz. Çağdaş Türkiye Türkçesinde çar-çur, har-hur, hart-hurt, fart-furt, zart-zurt gibi ikilemelerde bulunan ünlü nöbetleşmesinin Özbekçe ve Uygurca gibi çağdaş Orta Asya Türkî dillerinde de bulunduğu gibi, 11. This finding suggests that a well-defined distribution of sonority distances constitutes a relevant phonotactic primitive and motivates the core structure of clusters available in German.īu makalede üzerinde duracağımız konu iki heceli yansımalı ikilemelerde meydana gelen ünlü nöbetleşmesidir. More specifically, type frequency increases with an increase in the sonority distance between two adjacent consonants within a cluster. Linear regression modelling involving several types of distances as independent variables has revealed a positive correlation between type frequency and only one of the indices. These indices encompass auditory distances pertaining to the manner of articulation, place of articulation and the sonorant/ obstruent distinction. This study expands on previous analyses involving the principle by investigating which wellformedness indices implemented in the principle account best for corpus-based frequencies of consonant clusters. Markedness is determined on the basis of a phonotactic principle referred to as Net Auditory Distance. This paper investigates gradient markedness of word-initial consonant clusters in present-day Standard German. We discuss where existing theoretical accounts of the SSP require further development to account for our crosslinguistic results. Violations in onsets and codas are not symmetrical, especially when complex segments are treated as units. We examine which clusters cause the violations, and find a wide range: not only the notorious case of clusters with sibilants, but also with nasals, approximants and other obstruents. We find a significant proportion of languages violate the SSP: almost one half of the language sample. We consider the treatment of complex segments both as sonority units and as clusters. We adopt a phonetically-grounded definition of sonority – acoustic intensity – and examine how many languages contain SSP-violating clusters word-initially and word-finally. This study aims to clarify the empirical status of the SSP in a cross-linguistic study of 496 languages. The Sonority Sequencing Principle (SSP) is a fundamental governing principle of syllable structure however, its details remain contested. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |